LeaseDesk Get the Handbook

Guide · Deal analysis

Face rent, effective rent, and the difference between them

How to calculate net effective rent, with two worked deals. Updated July 2026.

Everybody quotes face rent. It is the number on the lease, the number the broker reports, and the number that goes into the market survey. It is also the number that tells you least about what a deal is worth, because it ignores every dollar you gave away to get the tenant in the door. Effective rent is what you actually end up with.

On this page

  1. What separates the two numbers
  2. The calculation, step by step
  3. A deal worked end to end
  4. The higher rent deal that is worse
  5. The present value version
  6. Where this changes what you do

What separates the two numbers

Four things stand between the rent you quote and the money you keep.

Net effective rent, usually written NER, is what is left after all of that, expressed the same way rent is so the two are comparable: dollars per square foot per year.

The calculation, step by step

  1. Total the gross base rent across the entire term, including every escalation.
  2. Subtract the value of the free rent, at the rate that applies during the free months.
  3. Subtract the tenant improvement allowance in full.
  4. Subtract the leasing commission.
  5. Divide what remains by the square footage, then by the number of years.

Operating cost recoveries stay out of this. On a triple net deal the tenant reimburses those, so they are not landlord income and including them inflates the answer.

A deal worked end to end

A 5,000 square foot suite on a five year term. Base rent starts at $20.00 a square foot and escalates 3 percent a year. Five months free at the front. A $15 a square foot improvement allowance. A 5 percent leasing commission on gross rent.

Gross base rent over the term
YearRate per sfAnnual rent
Year 1$20.00$100,000
Year 2$20.60$103,000
Year 3$21.22$106,090
Year 4$21.85$109,273
Year 5$22.51$112,551
Total gross rent$21.24 avg$530,914
What comes back off it
Gross base rent over five years$530,914
Free rent, 5 months at the year one rate($41,667)
Tenant improvement allowance, $15 × 5,000 sf($75,000)
Leasing commission, 5% of gross rent($26,546)
Net to the landlord over the term$387,701

Divide $387,701 by 5,000 square feet and then by five years, and the net effective rent is $15.51 a square foot. The face rent averaged $21.24. You gave away just over a quarter of the deal to get it signed, and none of that shows up in the number anybody quotes.

This is not an argument against concessions. Free rent and improvement dollars are often exactly what closes a good tenant, and a good tenant is worth paying for. The point is only that you should know what you paid, so you can tell the difference between a deal that looked generous and a deal that was.

The higher rent deal that is worse

This is where the number earns its keep. Two offers arrive on the same 5,000 square foot suite, both five years, both escalating 3 percent.

Two offers compared
Offer AOffer B
Starting face rent$22.00$20.00
Free rent6 months2 months
Improvement allowance$25.00 per sf$10.00 per sf
Gross rent over the term$584,005$530,914
Less free rent($55,000)($16,667)
Less improvement allowance($125,000)($50,000)
Less commission at 5%($29,200)($26,546)
Net over the term$374,805$437,701
Net effective rent per sf$14.99$17.51

Offer A has the higher face rent, by two dollars a foot. It also has an average face rent of $23.36 against Offer B's $21.24, so it wins on every number that would appear in a market survey. And it is worth about $63,000 less to you over the term.

Offer A is also the riskier of the two, because more of your money goes out the door before the tenant has proven they can pay. If they fail in year two you are out $125,000 of improvements on a deal that returned very little rent.

The present value version

The method above treats every dollar as worth the same whenever it arrives. That is fine for comparing two offers of the same length, and it is how most people in the market talk about NER.

It is not quite right, though, and the direction of the error is always the same. Your improvement allowance and your commission are paid at the start. Your rent arrives over sixty months, and the biggest payments arrive last. Money you receive in year five is worth less than money you spend in month one.

A more precise calculation discounts each month's cash flow back to today at a chosen rate, then levels the result into an equivalent monthly payment. It always produces a lower effective rent than the simple method, and the gap widens the more front loaded your concessions are and the longer the term runs. For comparing a five year deal against a ten year deal, or a heavy improvement package against a light one, it is the version worth running.

Where this changes what you do

Three places, mostly.

Comparing competing offers. Never on face rent. Two proposals with the same headline number routinely differ by several dollars a foot once the concessions are in.

Deciding how to concede. When a tenant needs a lower number, giving a month of free rent is usually cheaper than an equivalent reduction in rate, because the rate reduction compounds through every escalation for the whole term while the free month is paid once. Run both before you pick.

Setting your own floor. Knowing your break even effective rent tells you when to hold and when a deal is not worth doing. It also tells you what a vacant month really costs, which is the number most owners underestimate when they are deciding whether to stand firm on rate.

The calculator that runs both versions

The Commercial Landlord's Handbook includes the working models behind this page, already built:

See what's inside the Handbook One time purchase, native Word and Excel files, no subscription. 14 day guarantee.